Can we really get any definition or know anything in the method of dialectics? Can we really stop by admitting we know nothing?

This is my first ever look into Socratic views or how Socrates approached an issue. While this work shouldn't be judged on creative merits (even though Socrates is creative in his own way), this work should be judged on its lesson and moral of avoiding circular arguments, seeking pure truth, and candidly allowing yourself to let go of ideas you hold onto when presented with truth that goes against what you had previously thought. I gathered all of this from this very short work from Plato. I would highly suggest this to anybody.

This is not a dialogue as expected. It is a summary of the dialogue & therefore boring.